PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

BNY Gets the SEC’s Go-Ahead to Custody Crypto Assets

By Tom Nawrocki
September 25, 2024
in Analysts Coverage, Digital Assets & Crypto
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
PayPal Likes To Hold Your Assets: Allows You to Purchase up to $100,000 of Cryptocurrency per Weekq

PayPal Likes To Hold Your Assets: Allows You to Purchase up to $100,000 of Cryptocurrency per Week

With the blessing of the SEC, BNY Mellon will be allowed to hold assets for investors who own its crypto exchange-traded products (ETP), without needing to reflect these assets on its balance sheet. BNY aims to be the first bank to offer cryptocurrency custody services for its bitcoin and ether ETP clients.

The offering highlights the ongoing drama surrounding the SEC’s SAB 121 rule, which requires companies holding customers’ cryptocurrencies to record them on their balance sheets. Earlier this year, the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant reportedly reviewed BNY Mellon’s approach to crypto custody and said it had no problem with the bank’s decision not to list crypto assets as liabilities.

According to BNY, the SEC’s waiver of SAB 121 is specific to this particular use case for ETPs. It remains unclear whether other asset managers offering crypto investment products, like Fidelity, will apply for similar exemptions.

For many observers, this has raised the question of why this exemption has been carved out.

SEC chief Gary Gensler stated in his congressional testimony earlier this week that he won’t repeal SAB 121. In support of that position, he cited the FTX and Terraform bankruptcies and argued that crypto represents a liability for banks and asset managers offering ETPs that hold digital assets.

“Earlier today, Chair Gensler indicated that he would not rescind SAB 121,” responded Congressman Mike Flood (R-Nebraska). “Now that the office of the Chief Accountant is picking and choosing who needs to comply with SAB 121, why wouldn’t SEC simply rescind SAB 121 entirely?”

A Controversial Measure

SAB 121 has been controversial since the SEC adopted it in 2022. The goal aimed to enhance transparency in financial statements, clarifying the risks for those investing in crypto assets. However, the additional regulation and complexity have deterred some banks from entering the crypto space.

In May, the Senate rejected SAB 121 in bipartisan fashion, intending to expand opportunities for retail investors to hold digital assets in their bank accounts. However, this reversal of the regulation was subsequently vetoed by President Biden.

The BNY decision cracks open the door for more banks to custody crypto—provided they can obtain the proper permissions.

“BNY Mellon and so many others have been in the business of custodying people’s assets for 200 some years,” Flood told CoinTelegraph earlier this year. “They don’t want to be left on the sidelines.”

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Bitcoin ETFBNY MellonCrypto AssetsEther ETFSAB 121SEC

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Dual-rail recurring billing for agentic commerce

    Fueling Agentic Commerce with Dual-Rail Recurring Billing

    May 1, 2026
    credit union p2p

    How Should Legacy Banks Compete with Chime?

    April 30, 2026
    Prepaid cards for payroll and tipping

    Tips on a Prepaid Card: A Practical Solution with Broad Industry Impacts

    April 29, 2026
    credit-push fraud

    Inside the Battle Against Credit-Push Fraud: What’s Changing

    April 28, 2026
    real-time payments fraud

    Stopping Fraud in Real-Time Payments Before It Starts

    April 27, 2026
    Navigating Global Fintech Regulations Through Strategic Regulatory Arbitrage

    PACE Act Could Open Fed Payment Rails Beyond Banks

    April 24, 2026
    fraud agentic risks

    As Fraud and Agentic Risks Mount, Data Provides Continuity

    April 23, 2026

    Thirty Years and Counting: Bank of America Renews Alaska Air Deal

    April 22, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result